Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Golden Fleeced?

A day late, or so, but good analysis by Danny O'Neil on the Golden Tate catch Monday night vs. the Cheese. 

My analysis: 
1) Wouldn't be an issue if it was any team but the Cheese, the Belichicks or the Stealers! 
2) If it was caught by the Cheese, the national media would be saying things like "The Cheese did what great teams do - put themselves in a position to win", and 3) See O'Neil's #4 and...get over it!!!




Mid-Week Tech

Celebrating 25 billion (Dr. Evil voice) downloads, the Google Play store is having a sale! via @androidandme

Oh,  Apple and Appley-fans  via @techcrunch

Redbox and Verizon to team up before Christmas via @gigaom

But, you can buy followers too! Views vs. Followers via @bgr

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Miracast Wireless Display

Wi-Fi Alliance CEO on the Miracast wireless display for Android  via @androidandme

The Wife of Jesus?

All over the internet this week has been the story of a fragment of an ancient Egyptian document with the words "Jesus said to them, 'My wife...'" In all, the fragment contains just 33 words and incomplete sentences - an English teacher's worst nightmare! Karen King of Harvard University, one of the scholars charged with analyzing the fragment, stopped short of saying this proves Jesus was married, only to add that some ancient Christians thought Jesus was in fact married...to a woman...just to clarify...thought I'd throw that in for free!
Over the years, as these sorts of discoveries are unearthed and plastered all of the media, I've found these scholars (and there are more) to be level-headed, fair and accurate in their commentary. Check it out!
Darrell Bock
Craig A. Evans
UPDATE:
Larry Hurtado
Simon Gathercole



Monday, August 27, 2012

Thoughts on Commentaries

Finally feeling the doors of time are opening to do some more reading - actually to catch up on reading is more like it - I've once again got a stack of books beside my night stand that's too tall and more than I can read before I need to return them to the library!

A few of the books in the stack are commentaries, two on Matthew's gospel and one on Luke-Acts. Commentaries have always been a love of mine for 20 years. I've referred to them, I've studied with them, I've read them. However, this love isn't without frustration; a frustration of two paradigms.

It is common - too common - that many authors write commentaries that are either too technical or too superficial. They are not always to be blamed since the vast majority of them are contracted to contribute to a series, managed by a publishing house. On the other hand, a balance between the technical and the practical is truly difficult to achieve.

In the intro to his Matthew commentary, theologian Stanley Hauerwas (Duke University) has some interesting thoughts on commentating (I am summarizing here), which I think can bridge this often artificial gap:

1. Don't write about the author, as if the book is fixed to a point and time; write with the author as if the book is written to us.
2. Retell the story as Matthew tells it.
3. Write so as to create a hunger in your audience to re-read Matthew.
4. The commentary is not a substitute for the Gospel. Hauerwas organized his commentary according to the chapter divisions of Matthew in the hopes that people would read Matthew first and then turn to his commentary for reflection/interaction.
5. An approach that the Matthew (and the bible, really) is a narrative (essentially) and not a poem to find meaning in every stanza.
6. Avoidance of sectarian and high-brow language.
7. No over-preoccupation with one, singular, over-arching meaning.
8. "Assertions are reports on judgements that require further inquiry." Think about it!
9. Respect for Matthew's compositional austerity and reticence displayed in his "gospeling".
10. No over-preoccupation with what we really don't know!

A long list, I realize - and I'm not usually one for "lists" - but good food for thought. If we never write a commentary, no worry - our lives should be commentaries!

Sunday, August 26, 2012

The Art of Reading...Narratively

Paul Borgman's "The Way According to Luke" is an interesting study in the art of biblical narrative reading. Borgman, an English professor, knows the playing field and writes his work to level it for the modern reader of Holy Scripture. Early in his book, however, he's honest about what he sees as inbred problems facing those that have been told that reading the Bible is a good thing. Basically - we don't know how to read! Oh, we read...but not with great skill. Borgman lists 5 challenges to skilled scripture reading:

1. We readers miss meaning because we read the text (but silently and without on-going reflection).
2. We read piece-meal.
3. We are strongly predisposed.
4. The text appears choppy.
5. We can be committed to liturgical practices that reinforce our bad habits.

Thoughts? Shout them out below.

Thursday, August 23, 2012

Latest article on Husky Haul

 
The Huskies are about to embark upon a foreign tour which will take the team to Europe and Africa. Games will be played in Barcelona, Nice, Monaco, Paris before wrapping up in Aziz N’Diaye’s native country, Senegal. The last few weeks have been very busy at Montlake and this tour will certainly not aid in slowing things down. As the Huskies eye the date of their departure (August 25th), what will make a successful trip?

Rotations
In a recent interview on KJR’s Mitch in the Morning program, Romar stated that this year’s team may settle into a more defined rotation earlier than in years past. I imagine, barring injury, the starting five are Gaddy, Wilcox, Suggs, Simmons and N’Diaye. They key for the Huskies, long term however, may well be that second rotation - however deep - off the bench. Romar’s shown in the past that minutes are there, but minutes must be earned. Though it’s early, we may see someone emerge from the bench that mandates minutes, even if they remain part of the second rotation.

New High Post Offense
On the heels of the Dawgs hiring former Western Washington University head coach, Brad Jackson, Romar announced the change from a motion offense to a high post offense. The high post offensive set is often attributed to John Wooden, who of course used it to great success at UCLA. Though there are varieties, the basic philosophy is to employ the strengths of each member on the floor, with proper spacing and flexibility in attacking the basket - oh, and a high post!

The reason Romar sited for the change, was that it better fit his personnel. It’s difficult to say what impact the Jackson hiring had on the decision, since he ran the high post successfully at WWU, but it does signal a shift in offensive philosophy, at least. Regardless of the origin and goal of the new offense, the overseas tour allows the Huskies to begin to draw upon its unique characteristics and gain a deeper level of familiarity with its intricacies. With guards who see the floor well, and athletic big men who can knock down perimeter shots - I’m thinking of Jarreau and Simmons - the new offensive set will likely provide the structure that, at times, seemed to lack last year.

This tour, due to NCAA rules, can only be taken every four years. In addition to being a life changing cultural experience and providing some additional exposure for the program, the European/African tour will mark the first step in what is shaping up to be a very intriguing season. Go Dawgs!

Thursday, August 16, 2012

A Sco Kinda Day

Great recording by John Scofield. Only problem, I may not make it past the first song!  Via @grooveshark

Works for Me

Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Ubuntu One Storage - 500 MB

Help me - and others that you refer - get an extra 500 MB of storage by signing up through this link . Similar to Dropbox, Ubuntu One is a great, free and dead simple option for cloud storage. Check it out!
HT: Web Upd8

Silver Lining for the Post-McLaughlin Huskies?

Latest article on the Husky Haul site - Post-McLaughlin Huskies

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

How God Became King

Great video intro and interview on Tom Wright's recent work on the Gospel story and God's kingship, How God Became King. Salient points:

  • Each generation has to learn how to articulate the  Gospel story
  • Gospels reveal a narrative strategy
  • "Theme" of the gospels is God becoming King

I haven't read the book yet, but plan to and it's that third point in particular that I'm most interested in, to see how he teases it out and how he connects it to the Old Testament, which had such a robust view of the King and Kingdom.

Please...drop your thoughts in the comments section!

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Chrome vs. Firefox in Ubuntu


I'm a fan of Chrome. I'm a fan of Firefox. I'm a fan of Ubuntu. I go back and forth between these two browsers, but I don't go back and forth between Ubuntu and another computer OS.

Chrome is known for its speed, and of course, its integration with the panoplia of services, most of which I do use. Firefox, while not quite as fast, for me anyway, is a bit more tightly integrated into Ubuntu, being the OS's browser of "choice". Downloads are faster and software is integrated into Ubuntu's software center. Both pride themselves on being "open" and both are fighting for users in an increasingly competitive space. Chrome now owns over 33% of the browser market.

For you Ubuntu advocates, which browser reigns supreme? Comment below

Thursday, August 2, 2012

The No Excuse List

Found this website; not comprehensive, but worth the look anyway. Get busy and cut the excuses!!!
http://www.noexcuselist.com/

Thursday, July 12, 2012

What Kind of Church Would We Be, If...?

If we listened to the epistle of James? James, the brother of our Lord, wrote one of the most intriguingly direct epistles of the New Testament. Often likened to the New Testament version of wisdom literature (in the vein of Proverbs from the Old Testament), James does bear a resemblance to that genre, but in letter format.

If we were to listen to James today, what kind of church would we be? A church that:

  • Glories in tribulation and is not addicted to "success"
  • Lives the Message holistically, weekly, not just on Sunday
  • Doesn't show favortism, particularly toward (or for) those that are esteemed in the world's eyes (not in God's)
  • Places a premium on faithful works, not simply "proper" belief
  • "Bridles" the tongue and is quick to listen, particularly to outsiders
  • Displays true wisdom demonstrated in relationships marked by peace, accommodation and gentleness
  • Is serious about the spiritual aspect of relationships within the church, striving to avoid passing judgment on brothers and sisters
  • Practices justice in business, rewarding employees for their work, rather than using them for selfish ends
  • Exercises patience in suffering and identifies with those suffering
  • Relies on prayer, not programs, to accomplish God's work
Of course, much more could be said, but here are some of my thoughts. What are yours?


Wednesday, July 4, 2012

The Paradox of Freedom

One of my favorite holidays is July 4th. If you have kids, you know what I mean - a little parade in the morning, an afternoon nap, an early evening BBQ and then...you get to blow some stuff up, or at least watch while others do it (more) safely! Freedom is nice.

Given the date, I've been thinking on the section in 1st Peter - "Live as free people, not using your freedom as a pretext for evil, but as God's slaves. Honor all people, love the family of believers, fear God, honor the king." The paradox is that Biblical freedom is not a blank check to do whatever one wants. Instead freedom is directed back to being a "slave" of God, for the purpose of pointing people to God. Peter's message is as counter-cultural today as it was in the first century - is your freedom for you, or, ultimately, for others? Happy 4th!

Thursday, June 28, 2012

Narratology? Euangelion blog

Hopefully this discussion continues. My reply to the post is down in the comments (#3). It's really hard to get into the mind of how Israel and, by extension, the early church read her Bible when we focus first on what (we think) they read. Narrative theology and "criticism" attempts to get at the how question first and then apply it to the what question. Biblical authors were not primitive cavemen; they were artists. A narrative approach to Bible reading recognizes the incredible nuances behind and within the text; things we often miss. More to come, I hope.
“Narratology”, “narratological”

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Among Exiles

In looking recently at the parallels between Ezekiel and Revelation, I was struck by use of the term and motif of "exile". In Ezekiel, exile is explicit, as he states he is in exile with his countrymen. In Revelation it is implied, as John writes from the vantage point of "exile", banished to the isle of Patmos, "because of the word of God".  Is there significance in the vantage point of exiles for both of these authors? Does this vantage point have any bearing on our life of faith, whether or not we are geographically "exiled"?

First, Ezekiel and John embodied the situation of the people, before they spoke to the people. Ezekiel was present physically with his exiled people, no doubt feeling the sting of their solitude and disorientation. John wasn't present with the people he served, but his state, the state of "exile", no doubt paralleled that of the people he attempted to reach. Second, both Ezekiel and John developed a theology of exile and wove that theology into their message. Not only this, but they lived a theology of exile, embodying a faithfulness sustained by hope.

Is our context too different to warrant a connection to the example and exile theology of Ezekiel and John? Different, but not completely dissimilar. God's people today, no matter their setting or geographic location, are in a sense in "exile". It may not be a forced exile as in Ezekiel's day, or an imposed exile as in John's case, but as we long for the fullness of God's kingdom on earth, we realize our present circumstance is tainted by "exile". This present world doesn't completely align with God's promised reality and God's certain victory. Exile theology also places (sometimes thrusts!) God's people into the situation they are sent to address. Both Ezekiel and John saw the horrors a world in exile can produce, which no doubt gave them both the perspective of their God and the compassion necessary to talk to people in a compelling way.

"Exile" is disorienting and unsettling. By nature it is uncomfortable. However, it is where we sit. But, will we grumble about our vantage point, or recognize the blessing of our vantage point. Both Ezekiel and John used their position as exiles to powerfully speak to the powers set at odds with God's kingdom, using any means necessary to reach exiles in the grip of those powers. May God help us to do the same.

A Better Plan to Save the Astrodome

Sheesh....I thought this thing was long gone. Interesting, in light of our own (Seattle) history and current talks regarding a new NBA/NHL-suitable arena.
HT: New Geography
A Better Plan to Save the Astrodome

Google I/O via Fast Company

Trying to catch up on all the goings-on at Google I/O today? Fast Co. has a really nice summary with media and links. Me? I'll take one of each please!
Fast Co. on Google I/O

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Thursday, June 21, 2012

What Politicians Are Really Saying on Arena Proposal

The SoDo arena proposal is now mired in political rhetoric from political politicians - the worst kind! What are they really saying?

  • What about Key Arena? - The Key is a dead-end cul-de-sac of a facility. We can't solve it, so we want someone smarter than us (read: you, Chris Hansen) to solve it!
  • What about Bellevue? - Gosh, I wish those rich eastsiders would take this off our plate!
  • What about a public vote? - I'm too chicken to make a tough decision...
  • Mr. Hansen is in it to make a profit. - He has evil motives and is an evil man.
  • I haven't seen the plans. - I haven't seen the plans, but I'm too stupid to know that plans are not required at this point and will be coming in due time.
  • Will create too much traffic. - I just don't want this "gift" from Chris. I just don't want it.
  • The Port will create 100,000 jobs. - The Port is bleeding jobs and needs a rhetorical dagger. 
In the end, I don't think political rhetoric will win out; common sense will. But, political rhetoric can certainly log-jam even the most well laid plans. 

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

2012 Recruiting Class - Total Bust?

The Huskies have effectively closed the books on the 2012 recruiting class after unsuccessfully attempting to land William Howard and Mouhammadou Jaiteh. The Huskies did add two transfer recruits, only one of which will play this season. Is 2012 then a bust?

Pay it Forward
Closing 2012 with one scholarship remaining, means it can essentially be rolled over to 2013, the class that Romar and his staff have their sights set on. Romar’s off to a great start in landing a bona fide leader in Nigel Williams-Goss, who has also stated a desire to attract other 2013 recruits to UW.

McLaughlin...Fill it Up, Son!
It seems that every year national writers and fans alike are asking, “Where will the Huskies turn to replace the scoring that left?” due to graduation, or in the case of this year, the draft. 32 points per game walked out the door as freshman phenom Tony Wroten and sophomore sharp-shooter Terrence Ross declared early for the NBA draft. The answer, in part, to that pressing question is Mark McLaughlin, a transfer from Tacoma Community College, where his 27.5 points per game lead the nation. Long recognized a D-1 talent, expect McLaughlin to make an immediate contribution at the wing. McLaughlin is also an above average passer and has respectable handles for a guard with his size, 6’6” and right around 200 lbs.

Turn to the Returning
Recruiting classes are only part of the equation, which is strange, I know, to assert in an article on the same topic. Recruiting classes make for good national discussion for sure, but what about what a team returns? Keep in mind that Scott Suggs will be returning for his final season - treat him as a one and done! I think Husky fans will see immediately why he was sorely missed last season - sharp shooting, calm and collected, knowledge of the Husky way. The aforementioned departure of Ross and Wroten and the need for backcourt scoring and able defense will also be filled by C.J. Wilcox. The Huskies perimeter game will put enormous pressure on opposing defenses, which creates other lanes and looks for others.

No Fronting on the Front Line
With the Huskies unable to land Howard or Jaiteh, another member of the frontcourt will need to step up. Aziz N’Diaye returns for his senior season and it’s reasonable to expect what he’s already proven - an intimidating 7 footer clogging the middle and windexing the glass. However, there are minutes to be had at the small forward spot, and while Desmond Simmons has the advantage returning after an effective freshman campaign, it remains to be seen who else can contribute at that position. Perhaps Romar will opt for a “by committee” type of rotation, but there are viable candidates in Breunig, Kemp and Jarreau. See the great analysis on the matter by John Chase.

Time will tell how the 2012/2013 team gels, but I believe the pieces are there, even if the 2012 recruiting class was a bit “thin” in terms of numbers. As such, the stage is set for those who have played in the system for a few years to contribute in a big way and the “newcomers” - including redshirt freshmen - to carve their own important niche.

Thursday, June 14, 2012

Summary of the People of God

I don't know of a theological blogger that challenges set patterns of thinking more than Andrew Perriman, who blogs at postost.net. He advocates a "Narrative-Historical" way of reading the Bible, particularly the New Testament. Always thought provoking, and deep, Perriman bucks trends and in the end, though widely read, is really his own man. Worth the read, but block out some significant chunks of time to ponder the direction he takes with the narrative of Scripture. No, you won't always agree, but you'll be educated along the way.


With that as a long introduction, I found this quote today in one of his recent posts - "From Abraham onwards the people of God is a community of new creation in the midst of the nations and cultures of the world." Well, said Andrew...well said.

Husky Summer Ball

A piece I wrote for The Husky Haul on summer league ball. Enjoy!

Slick Watts on KJR

Even if you're not a basketball fan, this interview with Sonic legend Donald "Slick" Watts is worth the listen. Listen as Slick describes life before LeBron headbands! Enjoy...and bring back the Sonics!

Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Patent Crazy

I wonder if the fact that the majority of the public would find this ridiculous means anything. Probably not, but it should.
http://androidandme.com/2012/06/news/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-gets-a-reprieve-from-potential-u-s-ban/

Thursday, June 7, 2012

Election, Damnation and Pharoah

I'm a fan of Tim Gombis. He has a way of explaining things in a "tight" fashion as to literary, theological, narrative and linguistic context. Basically, he's great at teaching people to be better readers of the Bible - seems like, in part, the "movement" or push to get people to read their Bible has forgotten to tell people how to read their Bible. In addition to formal teaching, Tim maintains an active role in his church and those in need within his community.
Here's his latest in a series of blog posts on the doctrine of election. This post covers the idea of election to damnation and Pharoah, both vexing problems for the average Bible reader who has been taught double pre-destination or have stumbled upon the Pharoah narrative in either Exodus or Paul's recalling in Romans. Enjoy!

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Draft Boards, Updside, And Terrence Ross

Here's a piece I wrote for Husky Haul on Terrence Ross and what the national draft experts are saying...oh, and my take too!

Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Wayne Shorter's First Album

Listening to an album I didn't know existed! "Introducing Wayne Shorter" by...well...duh, Wayne Shorter. Nice post-bebop and early, early Wayne Shorter w/ Lee Morgan, Wynton Kelly, Paul Chambers and Jimmy Cobb (the rhythm section famous for their work w/ Miles Davis). Always loved Wayne's tone and ideas,which are all his own. Cobb is impressive too, with his complimentary fills and nice, clear cymbal work. Check it out!

Paul's Purpose for Romans

One of the most celebrated Biblical books is with out doubt, Paul's letter to the Romans. Typically Romans is thought to be Paul's theological manifesto, a sort of a systematic sketch of the Christian faith. To be sure, Romans is rich with theological insight, depth and doctine; would we expect anything different from one of history's most profound thinkers? I once knew of a man that read Romans once a day for a number of his adult years. No doubt he gained insight into the depths of the time honored doctrines of faith, justification, sin and redemption. Perhaps, however, what he gained in insight, he may have lost or lacked in practice.

Paul's purpose for Romans is not primarily doctrinal - to pass along a system of believe - but "pastoral". In other words, his desire is to shape the community to whom he addresses his letter - faithful Jews and Gentiles - and influence their practice. In Romans, doctrine is front and center, but it never supplants faithful practice; neither does it assume it. In Romans, and I would argue the rest of the Bible, the point of doctrine is to inform and shape the community.

"Community" leads me to a final point. Spiritual communal formation is much more than a few application points after a theological dissertation (read: sermon). "Application" as it is typically termed in the church, focuses too much on the individual and not enough on the community - to whom Paul was speaking (separation of years, context and original audience not withstanding). The problems with this approach are legion, not the least of which is creating the notion that the Bible is about us (the actors) and not primarily about God (the author and main character).

In the end, Paul's words stand - "I am writing to you, all those loved by God in Rome" and "I want you all to know how often I've intended to come to you, so that I might have some fruit among you...I am a debtor to all...thus I am eager to preach the Gospel to you who are in Rome."

 

Gospel Sketch: Galatians

Often overlooked and overshadowed - for sure - by it's longer counterpart, Romans, Paul's letter to the churches in Galatia certainly holds it's own when it comes to understanding Paul (especially so), and more importantly the Gospel he preached.

Following is a short sketch of the Gospel from Galatians, chapter by chapter:

Chapter 1

  • The Gospel is announcement, needs to be preached and needs someone to 'announce" it.
  • Preach = to announce good news; apostle = ambassador, delegate or representative

Chapter 2

  • The Gospel is for all people.
  • An outworking of the Gospel is "table fellowship" between those that are justified.
  • Justified = declared to be in the right with God

Chapter 3

  • The Gospel works by faith through promise; it doesn't not work through law and curse.
  • The Law, Torah, is not, however, opposed to the Promise (Gospel).

Chapter 4

  • The Gospel produces heirs that have the full benefits of "sons", not household "slaves".
  • The Gospel, as well as being based on Promise, is guaranteed through Covenant.

Chapter 5

  • Love is the language of the Gospel and love fulfills the intent of the Law.
  • The Spirit leads God's people into the Gospel life.

Chapter 6

  • Jesus is the pattern of Gospel (and Law, i.e. God's word) love, in both his life and sacrificial death.
  • Gospel love is others centered.

The Jazz Session #344: Tim Berne

Media_httpthejazzsess_uzeht

Interview with Alto master Tim Berne. Informative insight into his music and approach. Thanks Jason Crane!

Jesus, Exile and the Old Testament

Jesus from the Deesis Mosaic

Jesus from the Deesis Mosaic (Photo credit: jakebouma)

Read through a paper last night by Doug McComiskey, "Exile and the Purpose of Jesus' Parables" - 29 pages of goodness! His basic thesis was that Jesus thought the Jews of his day were still in exile and his parabolic teaching was used in part to underscore that fact to his audience. McComiskey draws on the work of NT Wright, understandably so, but does his own heavy lifting in connecting Jesus' words/parables to the original Old Testament texts. In doing so, he makes two significant points: 1) The original context/meaning of the OT was broad enough to include the generation of Jesus (and beyond). Therefore Jesus did not have to pour some "new meaning" into the older text. 2) Jesus saw himself connected tightly to the OT story and didn't simply use the OT to "proof text" his point.

These two points run contrary to much of the scholarly discussion today which leans more heavily on finding a deeper meaning in the OT text, on the one hand, and reducing Jesus' appropriation of the OT to simply prooving theological points on the other (proof texting - having a point and attempting to find a verse for support, usually without respecting the context). For McComiskey meaning and context work together to form a narrative, organic whole with Jesus at the heart of the story.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Beginning of the Gospel (Luke's Version)

Working my way through the Gospel of Luke, I have been struck by many of the comments in Darrell Bock's IVP commentary (part of the IVP New Testament Commentary Series); but what else is new? I've been challenged by his work for numerous years, and was oh so close to having him come out to speak at a church I was co-pastoring afew years back, and the plans just simply fell through. I always find Bock to be about as balanced an exegete as you'll find and what's more, he's a churchman and has managed to keep one foot in the academy and one foot in the church; oh, and one foot in the culture, even though he doesn't have three feet.

In his introduction, Bock talks about Luke's narrative strategy and how he builds his readers' appreciation of Jesus by starting where they're at, with concepts familiar to them, and taking them to deeper levels, revealing a Jesus that confounds and often out rightly defies categorization. At one point, Bock uses the term "seeker-sensitive". An apt term I think and one that has been misused in popular church culture and probably under-used in theological circles. Luke was far from "watering down" Jesus; he was building his case with that which was commonly shared, commonly understood.

Another interesting point for consideration is Bock's analysis of Luke's contribution to Atonement theory/theology. One would expect Luke's primary input to be centered on the classical, penal substitution model; in fact, knowing a bit of Bock's roots, that's exactly what I expected him to state. However, true to form, Bock goes where the text (in this case Luke) goes (it's what I appreciate about him and so many other careful exegetes God has gifted to His church) and makes the case that Luke's primary concern is to underscore Jesus' victory. In Bock's words, "he (Luke) highlights the victorious, exalted Lord who emerged from that death, along with the opportunity for forgiveness he provides" (pg. 23).

 

Apple and "Smart Growth"

In a recent article, ok blog post, in Better Cities and Towns, the author, Kaid Benfield, takes Apple to task for violating the "most basic tenants of smart growth and walkability" because apparently they're too cool and oh-so-hip, http://bit.ly/ynUBpz.>

Look, I'm no Apple fan-boy or apologist, but Benfield's post is so riddled with over-statements, (at best) half-truths and premised upon assumptive rhetoric that I had to come to their defense...I'm sure Apple is just waiting for me weigh-in. Heck, maybe they'll throw in an iPad 3 third gen iPad.

Suburbs get blamed for everything these days, from poor health, to traffic problems, to ruining "community". I'm not buying it; never have and doubt I ever will. I've been around urban centers for most of my life, and guess where I've encountered poor health, poor educational systems, traffic problems and "community-less" communities most frequently. Yep. The City. The City. But, I digress. Well not really, because that's where Benfield begins his diatribe. To rescue us from suburban plight (isn't that what he really wants?), Benfield argues for employing so-called "smart growth" techniques including, presumably, transit, walkways and little, if any, parking. I'm presuming here, but then if he's entitled, I'm entitled.

It continues to amaze me how "smart-growth" advocates have no problem telling people (or businesses) how they should use private land, as if they are in the position to speak for the public! Apple owns the land and is already bound by certain codes and regulations, at least at the local and state level and would need to comply accordingly. Is Benfield justified to tell a land-owner how best to use his hard-earned land? Again, Apple is already regulated on the land, but should they then be told how to use the land? A reasonable person would answer, "No". But, Benfield would certainly object, since he resorts to rhetoric which I think shows his true colors - "this (the design and building) is for the one percent." Oh, boo hoo.

Finally, Steve Jobs included the following in his vision for the new campus:

- Achieve 80% landscaping by undergrounding parking

- Vast increase in number of trees

- Primary energy source as natural gas

- Fitness center for employees as well as large cafeteria

- Decrease in surface parking of some 90%

- Concern to be shown for employee safety

- Buses runing on boifuel to serve the new campus

In my mind these things, while interesting and innovative, do not make or break the issue for me. They are not a "green badge of honor"...for me. Regardless, I support and applaud Apple's right as a property owner to develop their land as they see fit - within the proper guidelines and Codes, of course. And, if someone doesn't like the "private" decision of a "private" company, then they should return their iPhones and iPads as Benfield suggests. Or better, just send 'em my way.

 

 

 

Romans as story

When we read sacred Scripture, we are not only reading someone else's mail, we're ready someone else's story. However, it is a story that the reader - who believes it's message and Central Star - is a part of. (Fortunately, this sort of "participatory union" doesn't occur when the mailman puts my mail in my neighbor's box; a regular occurrence in my neighborhood!)

If we believe what we read, we become a participant, not a bystander, in the greatest story ever told. But, it helps to remember it is a story - with a plot, characters, a beginning, middle and end, etc. But, what about the parts of Scripture that are not in story form, like Romans, for instance?

In his first chapter, Paul the Apostle ties the life of Jesus (a story in itself) to the story of Israel (specifically David), as if he wants to ground all he's about to say in the Biblical narrative. In fact, the Jesus story is a story within a story, but that's another post for another day.

Not only does Paul ground what he's about to say in the Biblical story, it continues to inform the whole letter. So, his letter to the Romans doesn't narrate a story, the story narrates his letter. You can see this in full play with his allusions to David, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and Israel throughout the letter. The more we become familiar with the story(ies), the better we can plumb the depths of a letter, like Romans.More to come...

 

 

Oliver Lake on SoundCloud

Nice Oliver Lake piece that balances groove, composition, space and, of course, improvisation as only he can do.

http://soundcloud.com/oliver-lake/maasai-moves

 

Context, Audience and The Gospel in Romans

Expecting to jump into a cultural context and ecclesial context which he was not familiar with first hand experience, the Apostle Paul writes his letter to the church (or churches) at Rome. It seems that the churches in Rome were disperate, spread out and theologically diverse at least in terms of their practice, if not their belief. And since Paul seemed to have wanted the church at Rome to be a base for his mission to Spain - since he was not one to be the renegade apostle he's sometimes portrayed as - he had a lot of work to do if he was to "unite" them under the Biblical vision of what God had done in Christ; the message he sought to preach. 

Considering this "diversity" and Paul's desire to link it all together, it's interesting to see what Paul hones in on as he develops his story-informed letter. Is there a lesson for us, who live in diverse times, cities and places?

The central concern of Paul, I believe, is to get down to the narrative which unites all of God's people. That narrative is the Good News, or the announcement that Jesus is the Lord's Messiah and the rightful ruler of all of God's creation. This is Paul's greatest concern as he unfolds his letter and I believe we can read Romans as a sustained defence of God's narrative, the gospel. This is, above all else, what Paul wishes for his readers to grasp. His "if you don't get anything else I say, get this!" type of moment.

If the gospel - God's narrative - is the common thread of unity among this diverse groups of believers, how much more for us? 

Loop Collective

Interesting indie jazz site - never would've happened had Algore not invented the inner-tubes - some stuff is way "out", some not so much like this recording from a new-to-me Tenor player, Sam Crockatt. "Flood Tide" is immediately reminiscent of Ornette Coleman and Dewey Redman. Good stuff!

http://www.loopcollective.org/records/Other-Releases/Sam-Crockatt-Quartet-Flo...

http://www.samcrockatt.com/

 

The Narrative of Romans 2

Too often - perhaps out of just plain 'ole bad reading habits - we apply Romans 2 as a moralistic lesson about judging; why we shouldn't and the eventual fate we'll surely face if we fall prey to this most insidious sin. True enough. However, can this chapter be reduced in such a way? No, this section of Romans is much more than a moral lesson about not judging others. Chapter 2 is inextricably linked to Chapter 1 (keep in mind that chapter divisions were not in the original copies of Scripture; the intent for the original audience was either longer sustained readings - if they could in fact read and had a personal copy - or long sustained hearings) and we do well to try and catch Paul's flow of thought.

What makes Romans 2 much more than a moral lesson on judging is the group it was (is) addressed to. Here again, we need a gentle correction. It's common for our English Bibles to have the chapter heading - on a chapter division that was not contained in the original - of something like "God's Judgment Against the Moralist". If the chapter divisions inserted hundreds of years later than the original autographs were not inspired, then what can we say of chapter headings which came more than a millennium later?!

The shocking power of Romans 2 lies in the fact that Paul, as he had done in Chapter 1, is narrating a story about a people group. The difference is the people group of Romans 2 is the Jewish nation, who had been entrusted with a vocation to be the world's light, God's ambassadors sent into a "Romans 1" type of world, where darkness and sin reign, where human beings, created in God's image, flounder and fail. Despite possessing everything to fulfill their vocation, Israel largely failed - historically - and in Paul's day, had become somewhat of secret society as far as "outsiders" were concerned. In short, they prized their privileges above their calling, their unique status as God's people above the plight of the nations. This led Paul to summarize his kinsmen's vocational plight thusly - because of you, God's name is blasphemed among the nations. 

Similarly, Christians - followers of Christ - pick up on essentially the same vocation as our spiritual ancestors Israel, to be a light to the world. However, by extension, Romans 2 asks us, will fall into the same trap as our ancestors? If the world of Romans 1 walked into our church gathering, would we require them to be just like us before we loved them?

One People of God

In Romans Paul's concerns are arguably as pastoral as they are theological. Certainly the two work together and feed one another, but throughout the history of the Church, the more common focus among theologians has definitely been the latter over the former. However, even if that be the case - Paul is more concerned with a theological "treatise" (theoretical theology) than praxis (practical theology) - Romans 4, as an example, can never be read apart from Paul's aim, or goal.

Paul begins by asking what advantage Abraham - the father of the Jewish people - has and whether or not he's justified in boasting before God? Two primary points lay in the backdrop of his question: 1) Paul's kinsmen may be prompted to boast about their lineage and connection to Abraham and 2) In their thinking if anyone can boast it would be Abraham, as he enjoyed such a lofty and promise-filled relationship with God. So, what follows the introductory question in chapter 4, is not simply a theological explanation of justification or faith, but a defense of the "one people of God" view that Paul fought tooth and nail to uphold. If exclusive allegiance to Abraham meant the believing Jew could boast, or that Abraham himself could boast, those so inclined would feel justified in prizing their special relationship with God over those (Gentiles) less fortunate, and an unnecessary schism in the Church results, since by definition the point of the Church is to reflect the "one people of God", Jew and Gentile together under one King (Jesus), reflecting to the world what the Prophets were pointing to.

Today, boasting of one's pedigree, privileges and status is no less a common occurence, however, it's never based upon Abraham! The church in America is not healthy when it comes to reflecting the "one people of God" vision of Paul. In fact, it's downright sick. I know of a pastor who is famous for saying, "Sunday at 9am is the most segregated hour in the week." I think he's referring to race, primarily - that each ethnic group worships independent of the other, at their own congregations - but the principle and sentiment can certainly, and should be, applied from race to culture and back again. Increasingly, America is becoming sub-culture, culture whereby groups are organized around affinity as well as race. I say that not to diminish abuses that are (still) clearly prevlent around race matters, but to simply point out that the church has to welcome all of God's children, rich, poor, black, white and everything and everyone in between.

To realize this robust "one people of God" vision, take some time to first be aware of your surroundings. You may attend an affluent church; be aware that the person next to you on Sunday morning in the pews, may be flat broke. Welcome them, love them, give them dignity, and for the sake of the gospel and it's Architect, do not "boast" in what you have, as if that matters! You may be aware of your church neighbor and her plight - great! Maybe you need to begin to move outside of your four walls then and serve alongside a church of a different ethnic group, for instance. Learn their gospel "flavor" if you will. Listen. Learn. Serve and then praise your God who desires to make "one people" out of many, spiritually, without making them the "same" robotically.

 

Friday, June 1, 2012

Current Playlist

Albert Ayler - Vibrations / Spiritual Unity
Always amazed by Ayler; raw emotion, blues roots and extends the late-Coltrane era freedom, though in overtly simple forms.

John Coltrane - Live at the Villiage Vanguard Again
What can I say? Coltrane and Pharoah blowing over two of 'Trane's greatest "hits" Naima, My Favorite Things. Pharoah's solo on the former is simply stunning as he displays an uncanny ability to pay homage to the melody, yet stretch it, not beyond recognition, but perhaps beyond the original intended limits. Wow...Oh, and...Rashied Ali...that is all.



World Saxophone Quartet - Requiem for Julius
Stumbled upon this one, dedicated to Julius Hemphill, one of the founding members of WSQ who passed away too early. Vintage WSQ, with John Purcell taking Hemphill's chair admirably. Highly recommended. 

The Concern of Romans


In Romans Paul's concerns are arguably as pastoral as they are theological. Certainly the two work together and feed one another, but throughout the history of the Church, the more common focus among theologians has definitely been the latter over the former. However, even if that be the case - Paul is more concerned with a theological "treatise" (theoretical theology) than praxis (practical theology) - Romans 4, as an example, can never be read apart from Paul's aim, or goal.
Paul begins by asking what advantage Abraham - the father of the Jewish people - has and whether or not he's justified in boasting before God? Two primary points lay in the backdrop of his question: 1) Paul's kinsmen may be prompted to boast about their lineage and connection to Abraham and 2) In their thinking if anyone can boast it would be Abraham, as he enjoyed such a lofty and promise-filled relationship with God. So, what follows the introductory question in chapter 4, is not simply a theological explanation of justification or faith, but a defense of the "one people of God" view that Paul fought tooth and nail to uphold. If exclusive allegiance to Abraham meant the believing Jew could boast, or that Abraham himself could boast, those so inclined would feel justified in prizing their special relationship with God over those (Gentiles) less fortunate, and an unnecessary schism in the Church results, since by definition the point of the Church is to reflect the "one people of God", Jew and Gentile together under one King (Jesus), reflecting to the world what the Prophets were pointing to.
Today, boasting of one's pedigree, privileges and status is no less a common occurence, however, it's never based upon Abraham! The church in America is not healthy when it comes to reflecting the "one people of God" vision of Paul. In fact, it's downright sick. I know of a pastor who is famous for saying, "Sunday at 9am is the most segregated hour in the week." I think he's referring to race, primarily - that each ethnic group worships independent of the other, at their own congregations - but the principle and sentiment can certainly, and should be, applied from race to culture and back again. Increasingly, America is becoming sub-culture, culture whereby groups are organized around affinity as well as race. I say that not to diminish abuses that are (still) clearly prevlent around race matters, but to simply point out that the church has to welcome all of God's children, rich, poor, black, white and everything and everyone in between.
To realize this robust "one people of God" vision, take some time to first be aware of your surroundings. You may attend an affluent church; be aware that the person next to you on Sunday morning in the pews, may be flat broke. Welcome them, love them, give them dignity, and for the sake of the gospel and it's Architect, do not "boast" in what you have, as if that matters! You may be aware of your church neighbor and her plight - great! Maybe you need to begin to move outside of your four walls then and serve alongside a church of a different ethnic group, for instance. Learn their gospel "flavor" if you will. Listen. Learn. Serve and then praise your God who desires to make "one people" out of many, spiritually, without making them the "same" robotically.

Thursday, May 31, 2012

Terrence Ross and the NBA

I don’t know about you, but in his two short seasons with the Huskies, Terrence Ross made me all but forget about that other Terrence; at least until that other Terrence won a national championship...but I digress.

After sitting out his senior season at Jefferson High School in Northeast Portland, Ross showed flashes of brilliance as a freshman as he adjusted his game to D-1 level. His sophomore year revealed the depth of his talent, as he often carried the young Huskies offensively. There were points in the season too where coach Romar called upon Ross to check the opponent’s best scorer. He did so, and in that fashion, helped his team to victory.

On Thursday, June 28, 2012, Ross will be chosen in the first round of the NBA draft by a team who will no doubt not only need and covet his services and skill set, but drool at the possibilities his athleticism brings to the NBA style of play. How does Ross project as a pro?

I, like a majority of Husky fans, wish Ross and Wroten could have stuck around for another year. Oh, what could have been?! But, when you size up Ross’ skill set, can you blame him for declaring early? No. At 6’6”-6’7” he’s a big 2 guard, and his uncanny athleticism allows him to slide down to the 3, if the situation calls for it.

Many players who declare early for the NBA draft are picked on the basis of their upside; how they project as they improve their game and adapt it to the rigors of the NBA style of play. Some haven’t developed an outside shot, for instance. Some big men may not be polished in the block offensively. Sure there are improvements Ross can make, but he’s not a project; he’s pro-ready. He has a wet jumper, as they say, and when committed, can be stellar defensively.

Recently SLAMOnline had a nice write up and a corresponding video on Ross’ workout with Impact Basketball’s LA branch http://www.slamonline.com/online/nba/2012/05/nba-pre-draft-tour-terrence-ross-workout/ . Workouts included long-time NBA vets and the audience included half a dozen NBA executives. Needless to say, Ross was impressive with his range on his jumper and skill around the basket.

So what, besides athleticism, does Ross bring to the NBA? First, the ability to create and find his own shot. This is crucial as a 2 guard when every night you face big, long, versatile defenders. Second, the moment Ross walks onto the floor, the other team is forced to consider matchups, particularly if Ross is drafted by a team with an offensive-minded point guard. Third, I believe Ross has the ability to be a great defender, even a lock-down defender. But this is the NBA, where defense is an afterthought, right? Yes, if you’re the Golden State Warriors! But if you look down the line at the teams that will make deep playoff runs, they play defense. They have to if they want to win.

A few of the online draft boards have Ross going 17 to the Dallas Mavericks, who could be a good fit, given their style of play and the possible departure of certain key free agents, like Jason Terry (15 ppg). On the 28th of June we’ll find out where Terrence Ross lands, and the team that drafts him will find out first hand what we’ve known for some time - Ross is boss.